My article never says that climate change isn't real. It never even suggests it isn't man-made or that the scientists are wrong. If anything it only suggests that scientists are human, and can sometimes fail to realize that they don't know what they don't know. I think the righteous arrogance of your comment is a good example of that.

It's very possible that things will not proceed in a linear fashion indefinitely, and you cannot anticipate every possible outcome, though you apparently draw some sense of pride from acting as if you know the future beyond a shadow of a doubt.