I’d agree with you. I think there’s a lot to the physical reality that is beyond our comprehension and beyond words. Even with something like infinity, we can give it a name, but we can’t really fathom it. One of the reasons I feel so confident in the argument I made here is this: It’s a semantic impossibility. If we can give a thing a name and characteristics, then it can’t be nothing. The existence of nothing is oxymoronic. I feel like the argument isn’t saying that it’s impossible out there (in reality); rather, it’s impossible for us to recognize that distinction, which, functionally, equates to it being impossible out there. It’s a solid point you’ve made though.

Thank you for the thought-provoking comment and for taking the time to read in the first place! I appreciate it